
Both families seal well in the right place. The mistake is to use one where the other belongs.
Side by side
| Feature | Elastomer (FKM, HNBR, EPDM...) | PTFE and filled PTFE |
|---|---|---|
| Elastic recovery | High | Almost none |
| Temperature range | Narrower per polymer | Very wide, cryogenic to about 260 degrees C |
| Chemical range | Depends strongly on polymer | Widest |
| Friction | Higher, stick-slip possible | Very low, no stick-slip |
| Compression set | A design limit | Creep is the equivalent limit |
| Gas permeation | Good in tight designs | Higher |
| Shelf life | Limited, ageing | Excellent |
| Cost per seal | Low | Higher |
| Installation | Easy, stretch fit | Needs care, some designs split-groove |
| Surface needs | Moderate | Tighter finish and hardness |
Use an elastomer when
- A standard O-ring groove is available and fluids/temperature fit.
- Cost and availability matter.
- Static sealing at moderate pressure.
- You need good gas sealing and elastic make-up for eccentricity.
Use PTFE when
- The fluid or temperature kills rubber.
- Friction, speed or stick-slip is a concern.
- Long shelf life or no ageing is required.
- Cryogenic duty.
- Purity matters.
Use both
- PTFE-jacketed seal with an O-ring or spring inside. The jacket resists the fluid, the energiser gives elasticity.
- PTFE back-up ring with an elastomer O-ring. The back-up stops extrusion at high pressure.
- PTFE-encapsulated O-ring. A thin FEP or PFA skin over silicone or FKM.
- PTFE-lined metal or rubber diaphragm.
Questions that settle it
- What is the highest and lowest temperature in service and during upset?
- What is the worst fluid, including cleaning agents?
- Is the motion static, reciprocating, rotary or oscillating, and how fast?
- What leak rate is acceptable?
- What does a failure cost?
When the elastomer answer is marginal, a better rubber (FKM to FFKM, HNBR to FEPM) is often cheaper than PTFE. When it is clearly out of range, move to PTFE.


