Hardness, density and modulus as clues: guessing the filler system before the lab results arrive

A bench-top approach to reading a rubber. Three quick measurements already narrow the polymer family, the filler level and the likely cure, and make later analysis faster.

Intermediate2 min readArticleUpdated 2026-10-23FKMHNBREPDMNBR
Cover image: "Hardness, density and modulus as clues: guessing the filler system before the lab results arrive", with a hardness dial.

Before a single gram goes into a furnace, three quick measurements can tell you a lot. They also guard against gross mistakes later.

Density first

Density separates fluoroelastomers from hydrocarbon rubbers almost on its own.

Class Typical compound density, g/cm³
Silicone (VMQ) 1.1 to 1.5
EPDM, NR, SBR (black-filled) 1.0 to 1.2
NBR and HNBR 1.1 to 1.4
Chloroprene 1.3 to 1.5
FKM 1.8 to 2.0
FEPM 1.5 to 1.7
Perfluoroelastomer (FFKM) 2.0 to 2.2

A mid-grey rubber ring with a density near 1.85 is almost certainly fluoroelastomer. If it measures 1.45 it might be HNBR with heavy mineral filler, or a chloroprene.

Hardness and what it needs

Typical filler loadings for a given hardness differ by polymer. A 70 Shore A HNBR may carry about 40 to 50 phr of reinforcing black, while a 75 Shore A FKM can reach that hardness with 30 phr of coarse thermal black. If your part is very hard with a low filler measurement, look for high crosslink density, a plastic phase or resin reinforcement.

Modulus against hardness

Plot modulus at 100 % against hardness. Compounds on the same polymer and filler family fall near one line. A point well above the line suggests more crosslinking or a more reinforcing filler. A point below suggests a plasticiser or low cure.

A decision flow

  1. Density in the 1.8 to 2.0 band: start with fluoroelastomer and verify by fluorine analysis and IR.
  2. Density 1.0 to 1.4 with a nitrile band in IR: NBR or HNBR; check hydrogenation by double-bond bands.
  3. Density near 1.0 to 1.2 with no nitrile and strong CH bands: EPDM, NR or SBR, separated by IR and DSC.
  4. Silicone confirmed by Si–O bands.

These shortcuts do not replace analysis. They tell you what to expect and flag surprises.

About this article. It is original writing prepared from public sources, standards and general industry practice. It is not a copy of any book or standard and it is not engineering advice. Confirm values against the current edition of the standard and test in your own application. Only analyse material you own or are entitled to analyse.

Have a part to decode?

Send a part you own or may analyse. We estimate what it is made of and profile how it behaves. You get a profile to match, not a copied recipe.