Checking a reconstruction: the trial mix, the comparison table and when to stop

A reconstruction is a hypothesis. How to test it with a small trial mix, which properties to compare, how close is close enough, and how many iterations to expect.

Intermediate2 min readArticleUpdated 2026-10-23All polymersFKMHNBR
Cover image: "Checking a reconstruction: the trial mix, the comparison table and when to stop", with recipe bars in parts per hundred rubber.

The final step of reverse engineering is the only one that proves anything. You mix the proposed recipe, cure it and put it next to the original.

Prepare the comparison

List the properties that matter for the duty and agree the test conditions up front. For a seal compound this normally includes:

  • Hardness (Shore A) and density
  • Tensile strength, elongation and modulus at 100 %
  • Compression set at the service temperature, not just room temperature
  • Fluid swell in the real fluid at the real temperature
  • Low-temperature behaviour (TR10, or brittleness) where the duty is cold
  • Cure curve on a rheometer (ML, MH, ts2, t90)

Include the original, the trial compound, and whatever the customer's specification says.

A trial in four moves

  1. Mix small. A laboratory internal mixer or a two-roll mill is enough for a first pass. Keep the mixing sequence consistent and record temperatures.
  2. Check the cure curve first. If the rheometer curve is very different, stop and fix the cure system before testing anything else.
  3. Compare the physical profile. Cure to optimum, post-cure if the polymer needs it, and run the property list.
  4. Adjust one thing at a time. Hardness off? Adjust filler. Modulus low? Adjust crosslink density or filler structure. Set high? Look at the cure and post-cure and at the filler type.

How close is close enough

There is no universal tolerance. A useful starting point:

Property Reasonable match
Hardness within ±3 points
Tensile and modulus within about 10 %
Elongation within about 15 %
Compression set no worse than the original, ideally better
Fluid swell within the original's range
TR10 / low-temperature no worse than the original

Anything tighter should be justified by the application. A specification that says "match the original" without numbers needs to be turned into numbers.

How many iterations

Plan for two to four rounds for a straightforward compound and more for compounds in demanding duty such as sour gas, steam or rapid gas decompression. The final proof is the application test, not the lab table.

Document what you did

Keep the recipe, the mixing record, the cure curve and the test results together. That file is what turns a one-off sample into a repeatable compound.

About this article. It is original writing prepared from public sources, standards and general industry practice. It is not a copy of any book or standard and it is not engineering advice. Confirm values against the current edition of the standard and test in your own application. Only analyse material you own or are entitled to analyse.

Have a part to decode?

Send a part you own or may analyse. We estimate what it is made of and profile how it behaves. You get a profile to match, not a copied recipe.